Trending Elected Faces of Afghan House of Representatives (33); Path of 13 Lawmakers from Kabul, Herat, Faryab, Kandahar, Helmand, Logar and Nangarhar Provinces       |       Elected Faces of Afghan House of Representatives (32): Journey of 16 Representatives from 8 provinces and Kuchis Constituency       |       Elected Faces of Afghan House of Representatives (31); Path of 4 Representatives from Logar, Baghlan, Kunduz and Paktia Provinces       |       Elected Faces of Afghan House of Representatives (30): Journey of Eight Lawmakers from Seven Provinces       |       Elected Faces of Afghan House of Representatives (29): Path of Five Lawmakers from Kunduz, Baghlan and Kandahar Provinces       |       Elected Faces of Afghan House of Representatives (28): Path of 15 Representatives from 9 Provinces       |       Elected Faces of Afghan House of Representatives (27): The Journey of 13 Representatives from Daikundi, Maidan Wardak, Herat, Samangan, Ghor, Parwan and Kandahar Provinces       |       Elected Lawmakers of Afghan House of Representatives (26): Journey of 10 Representatives from Paktika, Balkh, Farah, Helmand, Sar-e Pol and Badakhshan Provinces       |       Elected Faces of Afghan House of Representatives (25): The Path of 3 Representatives from Panjshir, Laghman and Nangarhar       |       Elected Lawmakers of Afghan House of Representatives (24): The Journey of 5 Lawmakers from Nangarhar and Kunar Provinces
As IEC Validates Non-Biometric Votes, Electoral Monitoring Organisations and Political Parties React

As IEC Validates Non-Biometric Votes, Electoral Monitoring Organisations and Political Parties React

Reporter

Sarah Mishra Reporter

30 Nov 2018

The Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan (IEC) on Thursday clarified that it has counted both biometric and non-biometric votes as valid while declaring the winners and losers of the October 20 parliamentary elections. “Voters list was the base, anyone who participated in the voter registration process whether their votes were biometric or without biometric, but their names were present on the list, their votes have been counted,” said Sayed Zabiullah Sadat, deputy spokesman for IEC.

This decision has received criticism from electoral monitoring organisations,
“Statistics and the reports which we have received from the provinces indicate that in some provinces, biometric was the base and in some provinces voter lists was the base while in some provinces contents inside the ballot boxes were the base and there was not a specific standard for recounting of the votes and there was multiplicity in the recounting of votes in the provinces,” as told by Mohammad Omid Nawrozi, member of Transparent Election Foundation of Afghanistan.

Monitoring organisations believe that by counting all votes, IEC is violating its own laws and rules.

This comes after many political parties claim a lack of transparency in announcement of the preliminary election results.

As of now, the IEC has announced the preliminary results of 13 provinces.

The political parties argue that the results of votes in localities and provinces where biometric and non-biometric votes were blended will not be acceptable to them and it is unfair.


#afghanistan#elections